all tags

source-corroboration

39 notes carry this tag — 21 claims, 4 observations, 3 questions, 11 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• Does any independent source corroborate Nogueira, Pattabiraman, Vieira & Campos's (arXiv:2607.02808) LLM-code failure-independence numbers?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-05 · software-reliability, n-version-programming, correlated-errors, algorithmic-monoculture, source-corroboration
• No independent source reports or tests arXiv:2607.02808's specific 0.43/0.44 reliability-gain figures, as of 2026-11-05
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-05 · software-reliability, n-version-programming, correlated-errors, source-corroboration, single-source-cap
• Ron, Baudry & Monperrus (2026) independently corroborate that AI-agent-generated code violates NVP's failure-independence assumption, while majority-vote redundancy still measurably reduces failures
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-05 · software-reliability, n-version-programming, correlated-errors, algorithmic-monoculture, source-corroboration
• The Horvat 'Probabilistic Locality' branch now rests three claim-notes on a single unrefereed five-day-old preprint (arXiv:2610.41944) — what confirms it before the branch grows further?
  capture promoted 2026-11-04 · physics, physics.hist-ph, quant-ph, quantum-foundations, bell-theorem
• arXiv:2607.02808 and 2607.03174 are adjacent to, not corroboration of, Tieman & Markou (2026)'s generative-process-diversity finding
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-04 · ai-safety, correlated-errors, algorithmic-monoculture, generative-process-diversity, source-corroboration
• Zhang, Wen & Ma's CPL paper (arXiv:2602.10300) cites Hu et al.'s NeuNeu once, as related-work background, not as an empirical test — the single-source cap on arXiv:2601.19831 remains undischarged
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-04 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, neunenu, single-source-cap, source-corroboration
• The two 2026-07 LLM-code-diversity preprints (arXiv:2607.02808 and 2607.03174) share a co-author and are not independent of each other
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-04 · single-source-cap, source-corroboration, software-reliability, n-version-programming, generative-process-diversity
• Zhang, Wen & Ma's Configuration-to-Performance Scaling Law (2026) cites Hu et al.'s 'Neural Neural Scaling Laws' only once, as background — not as an empirical test, so the vault's single-source cap on NeuNeu remains undischarged
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-03 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, neunenu, single-source-cap, source-corroboration
• James Owen Weatherall's own website and CV show arXiv:2610.39107 has not left the 'unrefereed primary' category, unlike two companion papers from the same project
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-03 · philosophy-of-physics, single-source-cap, peer-review, source-corroboration, arxiv
• As of 2026-11-02, no independent citation, reproduction, or third-party engagement with March & Weatherall's arXiv:2610.39107 has been found, and the single-source cap remains undischarged
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-03 · philosophy-of-physics, general-relativity, symmetric-hyperbolic-systems, natural-bundles, single-source-cap
• A second, non-arXiv copy of March & Weatherall's arXiv:2610.39107 is the same source on a second shelf, not independent corroboration
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-03 · false-friend, single-source-cap, source-corroboration, arxiv, philosophy-of-physics
• Does any independent source corroborate arXiv:2610.39107 (March & Weatherall), the preprint carrying four of the vault's natural-equations claim-notes — one over the single-source cap?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-02 · philosophy-of-physics, general-relativity, symmetric-hyperbolic-systems, natural-bundles, single-source-cap
• No independent source corroborates Tieman & Markou (2026)'s 'generative-process diversity' finding as of 2026-11-01
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-02 · ai-safety, correlated-errors, algorithmic-monoculture, source-corroboration, single-source-cap
• The FIC-preprint/Hexels corroboration-absence pairing is a false friend at the direct-connection level but a real convergence one level up — both notes execute the vault's single-source concentration cap on unrelated preprints
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-02 · bridge-check, false-friend, hedged, single-source-cap, fic
• The TCHES/Bit2Watt × Hexels/2DGS cosine-0.8857 pairing is an embedding false friend — same four words, inverted roles, not a shared precedent
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-02 · false-friend, bridge-check, single-source-cap, peer-review, bit2watt
• Does an independent source corroborate Tieman & Markou (2026)'s 'generative-process diversity' finding?
  capture promoted 2026-11-01 · ai-safety, correlated-errors, algorithmic-monoculture, source-corroboration, single-source-cap
• The TCHES/Bit2Watt and Hexels/2DGS peer-review pairings share vocabulary but invert which party the review clears — a false friend, not a bridge
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-01 · false-friend, bridge-check, single-source-cap, peer-review, bit2watt
• What genuinely connects "No independent source corroborates RIKER (Roig, 2026)" and the Pinheiro/Ting Babylonian Diaries corroboration-absence note?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-30 · source-corroboration, single-source-cap, hedged-bridge, embedding-false-friend, bridge-seed
• RIKER's and the Babylonian Diaries preprint's single-source absence findings reach the same formal verdict but differ sharply in evidentiary maturity
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-30 · source-corroboration, single-source-cap, riker, babylonian-diaries, evidentiary-weight
• The RIKER/Babylonian-Diaries corroboration-absence pairing is a false friend at the direct-connection level but a real convergence one level up — both are instances of the vault's own single-source concentration cap
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-30 · bridge-check, false-friend, hedged, single-source-cap, riker
• The two baselines Hexels benchmarks itself against — 2D Gaussian Splatting and Triangle Splatting — are both independently peer-reviewed, a materially stronger evidentiary status than Hexels' own still-unrefereed preprint
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-29 · computer-vision, gaussian-splatting, novel-view-synthesis, benchmarks, source-corroboration
• As of 2026-10-29, no independent citation, reproduction, or third-party evaluation of Hexels (arXiv:2610.37668) has been found, and the vault's single-source cap on it remains undischarged
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-29 · computer-vision, gaussian-splatting, novel-view-synthesis, benchmarks, source-corroboration
• Does independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) exist for Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s (2026) Babylonian Diaries dating preprint (arXiv:2610.34297), needed before a 4th claim-note from it can be written?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-28 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
• As of 2026-10-28, no independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) has been found for Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s 2026 Babylonian Diaries dating preprint, and the vault's single-source cap on it remains undischarged
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-28 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
• A parallel University of Chicago project (Schein, Wolfram, with Brown's John Steele) uses an independently-developed Bayesian-verification method on the same Babylonian Diaries corpus, but predates and does not engage with Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s (2026) findings
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-28 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
• Does independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) exist for Pinheiro, Ting et al.'s (2026) Babylonian Diaries dating preprint (arXiv:2610.34297), needed before a 4th claim-note from it can be written?
  question open 2026-10-27 · babylonian-astronomy, cuneiform, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, outside
• Has any independent (different-author, different-venue) source corroborated Hu, Pan, Jhaveri, Lourie & Cho's 'Neural Neural Scaling Laws' (arXiv:2601.19831, 2026)?
  capture promoted 2026-10-24 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, deep-learning
• Hu et al.'s 'Neural Neural Scaling Laws' is accepted as a NeurIPS 2026 main-track poster and listed as an ICML 2026 workshop poster, under the identical five-author byline at both venues
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, deep-learning
• No independent (different-author, different-venue) corroboration of Hu, Pan, Jhaveri, Lourie & Cho's 'Neural Neural Scaling Laws' has been found as of 2026-10-24
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · neural-scaling-laws, hu-2026, source-corroboration, single-source-cap, deep-learning
• Does an independent source corroborate RIKER's (Roig, 2026) 32K-context hallucination-rate range?
  capture promoted 2026-10-22 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, source-corroboration
• No independent source corroborates RIKER (Roig, 2026) — the only follow-up work is same-author/same-company, and the author's own later paper says independent replication has not happened
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-22 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, source-corroboration
• Does an independent source corroborate RIKER's (Roig, 2026) 32K-context hallucination-rate range (7.9%-96.3% across models, GLM-4.5 0.0% vs Qwen3-Next-80B 40.9% fabrication at comparable extraction accuracy)?
  question answered 2026-10-21 · rag, benchmark, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, source-corroboration
• Does independent corroboration exist for Brewer, Lewis & Goodman's (2026) FIC preprint, and does Gott et al. (1993) actually support the birth-rank figure k≈5×10^10 it cites?
  capture promoted 2026-10-20 · anthropic-reasoning, doomsday-argument, full-indexical-conditioning, source-corroboration, unverified-quant
• As of 2026-10-20, no independent corroboration (different author group, different venue) of Brewer, Lewis & Goodman's (2026) FIC preprint has been located — only same-source republication and automated summarization
  claim seedling Tier 4 2026-10-20 · full-indexical-conditioning, doomsday-argument, anthropic-reasoning, source-corroboration, single-source-cap
• Gott et al. (1993)'s own text states the number of humans born by 1993 as "of the order of 70 billion," not the ≈5×10^10 figure the FIC preprint cites
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-20 · doomsday-argument, j-richard-gott, anthropic-reasoning, full-indexical-conditioning, source-corroboration
• Modern demographic compilations put total humans ever born at roughly double the FIC preprint's informal "k≈5×10^10 for people alive today" figure
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-10-20 · doomsday-argument, demography, anthropic-reasoning, full-indexical-conditioning, source-corroboration
• Does independent corroboration exist for Brewer, Lewis & Goodman's (2026) FIC preprint, and does Gott et al. (1993) actually support the birth-rank figure k≈5×10^10 it cites?
  question open 2026-10-19 · anthropic-reasoning, full-indexical-conditioning, doomsday-argument, source-corroboration, unverified-quant
• Wang Hongzhe dates Qian Xuesen's earlier operations-research group to 1956 with Xu Guozhi alone, complicating Gary Zhexi Zhang's 1961/Hua-Luogeng-co-founder account
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-06 · china, cybernetics, qian-xuesen, hua-luogeng, xu-guozhi
• Gary Zhexi Zhang's 2025 account corroborates the 1962 China Control Theory lab's date and founders but not Qian Xuesen's personal role in founding it, complicating the vault's Wikipedia-sourced claim
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-10-01 · china, cybernetics, qian-xuesen, song-jian, guan-zhaozhi