all tags

priority-dispute

66 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 38 claims, 2 observations, 1 entity, 6 questions, 18 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• Does Gamkrelidze's own account of the 1956 maximum principle describe the real division of labor, and why did only Pontryagin's name carry West of the Iron Curtain?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-05 · gamkrelidze, pontryagin, boltyanskii, mishchenko, maximum-principle
• Boltyanskii's own reported testimony locates the "Pontryagin" naming convention inside a Soviet-side credit negotiation under pressure, settled within the Steklov Institute rather than in Western reception
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-11-05 · boltyanskii, pontryagin, gamkrelidze, maximum-principle, credit-attribution
• The Pontryagin naming-credit asymmetry is not structurally identical to the vault's backprop-attribution cluster — the mechanism is documented internal pressure, not mutually unaware literatures
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-11-05 · pontryagin, boltyanskii, backpropagation, automatic-differentiation, credit-attribution
• The 1964 symmetry-breaking mechanism was discovered independently by three groups, but only Higgs's papers explicitly predicted a massive scalar particle
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-04 · physics, history-of-science, higgs-boson, priority-dispute, multiple-discovery
• The search for the Higgs Boson and the EBH mechanism (arXiv:2611.03315)
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-03 · physics, history-of-science, higgs-boson, particle-physics, CERN
• A Bell-Labs/Multics world connected Thompson and Schell before 1974, but it predates Karger & Schell's report and neither primary names it as the credit channel
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-29 · ken-thompson, karger-schell, roger-schell, dennis-ritchie, multics
• Linnainmaa 1976's post-2010 citers are overwhelmingly generic automatic-differentiation / field-growth papers, with backprop-priority historiography a small, identifiable minority
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · linnainmaa, citation-analysis, bibliometrics, automatic-differentiation, field-growth
• Schmidhuber's 2014 'Deep Learning' survey is the identifiable, narrow channel that carried Linnainmaa's backpropagation priority into mainstream ML citation practice
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-24 · schmidhuber, linnainmaa, backpropagation, priority-dispute, historiography
• Ken Thompson's Reflections on Trusting Trust names its own decade-older source and still became the origin story — a Matthew-effect instance
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-19 · cross-domain-bridge, cross-time-period-bridge, matthew-effect, robert-merton, ken-thompson
• Ken Thompson's 1984 "Reflections on Trusting Trust" cited its source as "Unknown Air Force Document" and asked readers to identify it; Karger & Schell came forward, and he corrected the citation in a 1989 reprint — and the field credits Thompson anyway
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-19 · matthew-effect, robert-merton, ken-thompson, karger-schell, computer-security
• Isaacs's recorded regret in Pesch & Plail's 'missed opportunities' survey is over dismissing his own 'tenet of transition' — not the 1963 Pontryagin near-miss
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-10-17 · rufus-isaacs, lev-pontryagin, priority-dispute, single-witness, documentary-source-criticism
• Does Linnainmaa's own citation trajectory, run through Nguyen & Eger's Age-of-Citation metric, actually confirm the field-growth mechanism — or is the backprop-priority-dispute resurgence doing the real work?
  capture promoted 2026-10-16 · linnainmaa, citation-analysis, bibliometrics, nguyen-eger, backpropagation
• Merton's 1957 paper observes that priority disputes are typically waged by the disputants' partisans, third parties who sometimes act as arbitrators rather than advocates — as Lyell and Hooker did for Darwin and Wallace
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · merton, priority-dispute, darwin-wallace, sociology-of-science, institutional-norms
• Olazaran's 1993 chapter applies Merton's multiple-discovery thesis to Werbos's backpropagation priority claim, even though Harry Collins' controversy-closure framework — not Merton's — governs its main Minsky–Papert–Rosenblatt analysis
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · perceptrons, olazaran, merton, harry-collins, multiple-discovery
• Mikel Olazaran's 1993 sociological history of the Perceptrons controversy lists both the 1969 and 1988 editions of Perceptrons alongside Robert Merton's priority/multiple-discovery corpus in one bibliography
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-10 · perceptrons, minsky-papert, olazaran, merton, multiple-discovery
• Hamel's own 1949 textbook states the prohibition at the very knife-edge example later cited as posing the "paradox," and gives the reason using Neumann's 1899 term
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-09 · physics, classical-mechanics, nonholonomic-systems, history-of-science, historiography
• "Hamel's paradox" is a 2010 coinage by Udwadia and Wanichanon, not a problem Hamel himself posed or left open
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-09 · physics, classical-mechanics, nonholonomic-systems, history-of-science, historiography
• The inadmissibility of substituting a velocity constraint into kinetic energy before forming Lagrange's equations, and its exact limits of validity, were established in print between 1895 and 1904
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-09 · physics, classical-mechanics, nonholonomic-systems, history-of-science, historiography
• Does any record independent of Isaacs's own 1965 preface corroborate the 'few days' margin by which he says he missed Pontryagin's book?
  capture promoted Tier 2 2026-10-07 · rufus-isaacs, lev-pontryagin, priority-dispute, single-witness, documentary-source-criticism
• Bipartite hop: the Perceptrons-1969-scan-availability note and the Merton-1957-no-Ranke note are a cosine-0.857 false friend at the claim level, with one genuine (but peripheral) citational bridge one level up via Olazaran 1993
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-06 · perceptrons, minsky-papert, rosenblatt, merton, quellenkritik
• Carrington's only sunspot-related Monthly Notices publication from his Churt era was an 1874 priority dispute asserting he first extracted usable sunspot data from Thomas Harriot's 17th-century manuscripts for Rudolf Wolf
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-06 · astronomy, solar-physics, history-of-science, carrington, harriot
• The vault's own Isaacs notes already carry two different senses of 'first' against Pontryagin, structurally mirroring Werbos's 1988/1993 divergence
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-06 · rufus-isaacs, lev-pontryagin, paul-werbos, priority-dispute, documentary-source-criticism
• Isaacs's 'few days' near-miss claim against Pontryagin is single-witness self-testimony, with no independent corroboration located
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-10-06 · rufus-isaacs, lev-pontryagin, priority-dispute, single-witness, documentary-source-criticism
• Isaacs's 1965 preface priority claim is an unflagged member of the vault's diplomatics cluster — the mechanism behind the Werbos/Isaacs cosine pairing
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-06 · diplomatics, rufus-isaacs, jean-mabillon, paul-werbos, priority-dispute
• A shared method is not a shared lineage — Mabillon's document-dating forensics reappears across six unrelated domains to settle authenticity and priority, and where the vault chased the genealogy it found mostly reinvention, with one documented descent
  topic map 2026-10-06 · moc, diplomatics, mabillon, documentary-source-criticism, priority-dispute
• Does any record independent of Isaacs's own 1965 preface corroborate the 'few days' margin by which he says he missed Pontryagin's book?
  question open 2026-10-06 · rufus-isaacs, lev-pontryagin, priority-dispute, single-witness, archival-research
• The Myth of Hamel's Paradox (arXiv:2609.35857)
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-04 · physics, classical-mechanics, nonholonomic-systems, history-of-science, historiography
• Merton's 1957 paper catalogs sealed deposits, journals' received-dates, and patent-office proposals as the documentary infrastructure that operationalizes priority-norm enforcement
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-04 · merton, priority-dispute, institutional-norms, sociology-of-science, documentary-method
• A full direct read of Merton's founding 1957 priority-disputes paper confirms no mention of Ranke, Mabillon, or Quellenkritik anywhere in its text
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-04 · merton, quellenkritik, ranke, historiography, priority-dispute
• Merton's 1957 founding paper narrates the Newton–Leibniz Royal Society adjudication as the textbook case of institutional priority-norm enforcement
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-04 · merton, priority-dispute, newton-leibniz, raphson, institutional-norms
• Merton's institutional-norm account of priority disputes and the null Quellenkritik-chain finding are a confirmed bridge, not a false friend — now corroborated from a second, independent Merton primary
  observation seedling 2026-10-04 · merton, priority-dispute, quellenkritik, historiography, cross-domain-bridge
• Isaacs's 1965 near-miss-by-days priority claim is an unlinked member of the vault's existing diplomatics cluster — the mechanism behind the Werbos/Isaacs 0.85 cosine pairing
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-03 · bipartite-bridge, rufus-isaacs, paul-werbos, lev-pontryagin, jean-mabillon
• Merton's institutional-norm account of priority disputes and the null Quellenkritik-to-priority-adjudication chain are not a false friend: Merton's own 1957 paper names the actual adjudication mechanism as social arbitration, not documentary source-criticism
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-30 · sociology-of-science, merton, priority-dispute, quellenkritik, historiography
• Bipartite hop: what connects claim-merton-priority-disputes-institutional-norm-enforcement and claim-no-documented-chain-found-from-quellenkritik-to-modern-priority-adjudication
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-29 · merton, priority-dispute, quellenkritik, ranke, historiography
• Stuart Dreyfus's 1990 paper names Werbos as the researcher usually credited with backpropagation, calls his derivation independent, and argues proper priority belongs to Kelley and Bryson
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-28 · stuart-dreyfus, paul-werbos, kelley-bryson, backpropagation, optimal-control
• Bipartite hop: does the cosine-0.84 pairing between claim-garfield-1980-survey-omits-chandler (epistemology) and claim-werbos-docsub-report-and-rhws-missing-1974-thesis-are-different-documents (ml-ai) reveal a real bridge, or is it a false friend?
  capture promoted 2026-09-27 · multiple-discovery, priority-dispute, merton, chandler, garfield
• A 1972 ASPR newsletter corroborates Ingo Swann's 1971–72 ASPR research program but never uses the term "remote viewing"
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-19 · cold-war-science, parapsychology, remote-viewing, stargate, aspr
• Is there a contemporaneous (1971-72) record independently corroborating Ingo Swann's account of proposing "remote viewing" on December 8, 1971?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-16 · cold-war-science, parapsychology, remote-viewing, stargate, aspr
• Ingo Swann's own memoir credits himself, not the SRI physicists, with proposing the term "remote viewing" after a December 1971 ASPR experiment
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-15 · cold-war-science, parapsychology, remote-viewing, stargate, contested-credit
• Is there a contemporaneous (1971-72) record independently corroborating Ingo Swann's account of proposing "remote viewing" on December 8, 1971?
  question open 2026-09-15 · remote-viewing, stargate, priority-dispute, cold-war-science, single-witness
• Schmidhuber states the 1914 Torres y Quevedo 'first practical AI' claim unhedged, unlike a comparable priority claim he hedges elsewhere in the same paper
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-29 · schmidhuber, torres-y-quevedo, whig-history, historiography-of-ai, priority-dispute
• Is there a documentable descent from Mabillon's diplomatics through general historical method (Quellenkritik / Ranke) to modern scientific-priority adjudication — or only a methodological analogy?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-07-31 · diplomatics, mabillon, historiography, quellenkritik, ranke
• Verify the origin of the term 'deep learning' against primaries: Dechter (1986), Aizenberg et al. (2000), and the Hinton-era popularization (c. 2006)
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-07-31 · deep-learning, terminology, priority-dispute, ai-history, history-of-ml
• Rina Dechter's 1986 AAAI paper genuinely uses 'deep learning' and 'shallow learning' as terms of art — for depth of constraint-satisfaction search, not neural networks
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-31 · deep-learning, terminology, dechter, ai-history, history-of-ml
• Neither of Hinton's two canonical 2006 papers — the Neural Computation deep-belief-net paper or the Science autoencoder paper — contains the phrase 'deep learning' anywhere in its text
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-31 · deep-learning, terminology, hinton, ai-history, history-of-ml
• No source found documents a causal chain from Ranke's Quellenkritik to modern scientific-priority adjudication; the field instead frames priority disputes as socially negotiated
  claim seedling Tier 4 2026-07-31 · historiography, quellenkritik, ranke, priority-dispute, scientific-priority
• Raphson's 1715 History of Fluxions used Newton's own papers and correspondence to assert his priority over Leibniz
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-31 · historiography, history-of-mathematics, priority-dispute, newton, leibniz
• John Wallis's 1685 history of algebra used Mabillon-style documentary evidence to rule for Harriot over Descartes in a priority dispute
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-31 · diplomatics, mabillon, historiography, history-of-mathematics, priority-dispute
• Malvankar's lab published the structural work overturning the Geobacter pili-nanowire model without Lovley as co-author
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-25 · electromicrobiology, geobacter, microbial-nanowires, e-pili, scientific-controversy
• The only text of Dreyfus 1973 reachable this session is a triangulated abstract, and it contains no explicit controllers-as-weights language
  claim seedling Tier 2 for the access-status finding (Semantic Scholar / Unpaywall); [unverified-mechanism — needs primary] for anything about the paper's actual content, since the abstract above is triangulated via aggregator metadata and search-snippet matching, never directly fetched from the IEEE Xplore record itself 2026-07-20 · dreyfus, schmidhuber, backpropagation, optimal-control, history-of-ml
• Schmidhuber's 'controllers-as-weights' framing for Dreyfus 1973 is confirmed only in Schmidhuber's own words, on two of his own venues
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-20 · dreyfus, schmidhuber, backpropagation, optimal-control, history-of-ml
• Does Dreyfus's 1973 'time-lag optimal control' paper actually contain the controllers-as-weights backprop step Schmidhuber attributes to it?
  capture promoted Tier mixed — see per-claim fields 2026-07-19 · dreyfus, schmidhuber, backpropagation, optimal-control, history-of-ml
• 'Credit assignment' names both the sociology of scientific credit and backpropagation's technical problem — and Schmidhuber sits on the hinge
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · credit-assignment, sociology-of-science, schmidhuber, backpropagation, history-of-ml
• The term 'deep learning' predates Hinton: introduced to machine learning by Rina Dechter (1986) and applied to neural networks by Aizenberg et al. (2000); Hinton popularized it c. 2006
  claim seedling Tier 4 2026-07-12 · deep-learning, terminology, priority-dispute, ai-history, misattribution
• Verify the origin of the term 'deep learning' against primaries: Dechter (1986), Aizenberg et al. (2000), and the Hinton-era popularization (c. 2006)
  question open 2026-07-12 · deep-learning, terminology, priority-dispute, ai-history, verification
• Two senses of 'credit assignment' — the Merton–Stigler sociology of scientific credit is the frame both the Dreyfus-1973 and Chandler notes were already inside
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-07-11 · sociology-of-science, credit-assignment, multiple-discovery, stiglers-law, matthew-effect
• Purdue established the first computer science department in the United States, in October 1962
  claim seedling Tier 3 2026-07-11 · computer-science-history, institutional-history, numerical-analysis, priority-dispute, myth-ledger
• Are Geobacter's conductive 'nanowires' protein pili or stacked cytochromes — and did Malvankar break from Lovley's pili model?
  question answered 2026-07-11 · electromicrobiology, geobacter, nanowire, priority-dispute, needs-primary
• Did Purdue establish the first US computer science department in October 1962, and does an independent primary source corroborate its priority over Stanford?
  question answered 2026-07-11 · computer-science-history, institutional-history, priority-dispute, verification, myth-ledger
• Does Dreyfus's 1973 'time-lag optimal control' paper actually contain the controllers-as-weights backprop step Schmidhuber attributes to it?
  question open 2026-07-11 · dreyfus, schmidhuber, backpropagation, argument-from-silence, priority-dispute
• Schmidhuber's "Dreyfus 1973" backprop-lineage link is uncorroborated by Dreyfus himself — both of Dreyfus's own retrospectives credit his 1962 paper and never cite 1973
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-07 · dreyfus, schmidhuber, backpropagation, optimal-control, history-of-ml
• Griewank 2012 never mentions Amari — the reverse-mode priority history and the Amari-SGD claim are non-overlapping literatures
  claim budding Tier 1 2026-07-07 · griewank, amari, reverse-mode-ad, history-of-ml, negative-finding
• The "Ivakhnenko 1965 = first deep learning" characterization is Schmidhuber's, hedged in his own peer-reviewed text, and rests on GMDH's layer-wise regression — not gradient training
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-07-07 · ivakhnenko, gmdh, deep-learning, schmidhuber, history-of-ml
• Does Griewank (2012) "Who Invented the Reverse Mode of Differentiation?" mention or discuss Shun'ichi Amari as a priority claimant?
  capture promoted 2026-07-05 · griewank, amari, backpropagation, reverse-mode, automatic-differentiation
• Is Amari's 1972 associative memory model mathematically equivalent to Hopfield's 1982 network, and what do the primary papers actually show?
  capture promoted 2026-07-02 · amari, hopfield, hopfield-network, associative-memory, ising-model
• George Sarton
  entity hub · history-of-science, priority-dispute, sociology-of-science