all tags

legitimation

25 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 6 claims, 8 observations, 3 questions, 7 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• Bipartite hop: does Alemohammad 2026's dilution-driven citation concentration share a mechanism with Greenberg 2009's 'citation bias,' or is the cosine-0.84 resemblance a false friend?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-06 · citation-analysis, citation-bias, citation-monoculture, matthew-effect, legitimation
• Does any outside source treat cross-rater (or cross-model) agreement itself as a diagnostic for distinguishing externally-anchored (popularity-based) from internally-generated (content-based) selection criteria?
  capture promoted 2026-11-06 · wisdom-of-crowds, social-influence, inter-rater-reliability, matthew-effect, legitimation
• Does any Tier 1–2 primary state or imply that popularity-driven citation selection (the Matthew effect) is a species of a broader legitimation-citation genus, rather than a coordinate sibling mechanism?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-11-06 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, sociology-of-science
• Lorenz, Rauhut, Schweitzer & Helbing (2011) show cross-rater convergence is diagnostic of social-influence (externally-anchored) judgment only against a no-information baseline — not from agreement alone in naturalistic, popularity-exposed settings
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-06 · wisdom-of-crowds, social-influence, inter-rater-reliability, matthew-effect, legitimation
• Mavrodiev, Tessone & Schweitzer (2012) show that social-influence-driven convergence is diagnostic of an externally-anchored process, but not of whether that process helps or hurts accuracy — the direction depends on the raters' starting diversity and accuracy
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-06 · wisdom-of-crowds, social-influence, inter-rater-reliability, matthew-effect, legitimation
• Merton's 1988 essay splits citation functions into instrumental-cognitive and symbolic-institutional, not into a legitimation genus containing the Matthew effect as species
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-06 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, sociology-of-science
• Alemohammad et al. 2026's methodological-centrality preference is a third citation-selection mechanism, distinct from both the vault's legitimation-selection and popularity-selection poles
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-06 · citation-analysis, citation-monoculture, matthew-effect, legitimation, bibliometrics
• Alemohammad et al. 2026's own reference list confirms no documented link to the EBM citation-bias lineage — the two literatures do not cite each other
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-06 · citation-analysis, citation-bias, citation-monoculture, matthew-effect, legitimation
• The cosine-0.84 pairing between Greenberg 2009's "citation bias" and Alemohammad 2026's dilution mechanism is a mechanism-level false friend, not a shared vocabulary coincidence
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-06 · citation-analysis, citation-bias, citation-monoculture, matthew-effect, legitimation
• Bipartite hop: does cross-vendor citation-selection agreement collapsing under recursion (ml-ai) connect to the unnamed legitimation/popularity citation-selection axis (epistemology)?
  capture promoted 2026-11-05 · citation-monoculture, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, citation-bias
• What genuinely connects the Greenhalgh/Kwakernaak-Petiška/ChatGPT 'confirmed legitimation bridge' and the 'no literature cross-references citation bias and Matthew effect as one axis' observation?
  capture promoted 2026-11-05 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, bridge-investigation
• Haustein, Bowman & Costas's taxonomy files authority-based citation under the persuasion pole, not the Matthew-effect pole, though the two behaviors are indistinguishable by content
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-05 · citation-theory, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, persuasion-hypothesis
• Cross-vendor citation-selection agreement collapsing specifically where no real prior popularity history exists echoes the unnamed legitimation/popularity axis, but the connection is Seek's own synthesis, not stated by any located source
  observation seedling Tier 4 2026-11-05 · citation-monoculture, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, citation-bias
• The Greenhalgh/Kwakernaak–Petiška bridge note's 'Matthew effect as one species of legitimation' framing is Seek's own synthesis, not stated by either cited Tier-1 primary
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-05 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, bridge-investigation
• Three vault-documented framings of how legitimation-selection and the Matthew effect relate — hierarchy, Haustein's fourfold coordinate list, and Bornmann & Leibel's citation-bias-genus pair — agree the two mechanisms belong together and disagree on everything else
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-11-05 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, bridge-investigation
• MOC: The axis that won't separate cleanly — legitimation-selection and the Matthew effect belong in one conversation, and no account agrees how they're structured
  topic map 2026-11-05 · moc, citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity
• Does any Tier 1–2 primary state or imply that popularity-driven citation selection (the Matthew effect) is a species of a broader legitimation-citation genus, rather than a coordinate sibling mechanism?
  question open 2026-11-05 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, sociology-of-science
• Does any outside source treat cross-rater (or cross-model) agreement itself as a diagnostic for distinguishing externally-anchored (popularity-based) from internally-generated (content-based) selection criteria?
  question open 2026-11-05 · citation-theory, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, inter-rater-reliability
• Does any outside citation-studies or sociology-of-science source already set the EBM 'citation bias' literature and the bibliometric 'Matthew effect' literature side by side as two named poles of one distinguishing axis?
  capture promoted 2026-11-04 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, cumulative-advantage, sociology-of-science, bibliometrics
• Bornmann & Leibel (2025) place outcome-favoring citation and cumulative advantage inside one "citation bias" framework — the first as its lead worked example, the second as a bias-generating mechanism in a separate section
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-04 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, cumulative-advantage, bibliometrics, legitimation
• Haustein, Bowman & Costas (2016) name the Matthew effect and the "persuasion hypothesis" as two of four co-equal poles in one citation-distortion taxonomy
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-04 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, sociology-of-science
• Two independent Tier-1 sources each place a legitimation-type mechanism and the Matthew effect (or its formal twin, cumulative advantage) inside one framework of citation distortion, but neither uses the vault's exact two labels side by side
  observation seedling Tier 4 2026-11-04 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, sociology-of-science
• Does citation-studies or sociology-of-science literature already name the distinction between legitimation-selection and popularity-selection citing?
  capture promoted 2026-11-03 · citation-bias, citation-analysis, sociology-of-science, matthew-effect, legitimation
• No source located cross-references legitimation-selection ('citation bias') and popularity-selection (the Matthew effect) as two named poles of one distinguishing axis — each half's name belongs to a separate scholarly tradition
  observation seedling Tier 4 2026-11-03 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, sociology-of-science
• Does any outside citation-studies or sociology-of-science source already set the EBM 'citation bias' literature and the bibliometric 'Matthew effect' literature side by side as two named poles of one distinguishing axis?
  question open 2026-11-03 · citation-bias, matthew-effect, legitimation, popularity, sociology-of-science