all tags

bibliometrics

55 notes carry this tag — 1 moc, 26 claims, 3 observations, 7 questions, 17 captures, 1 myth. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

• Each successive LLM release generation has a shorter scientific-citation lifespan than the last (Trišović 2026)
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-22 · citation-metrics, llm, arxiv, bibliometrics
• Does the philosophy-of-science or citation-analysis literature already name the specific in-between category the vault keeps rediscovering — two investigations that share a method but not a referent or a shared story?
  capture seedling 2026-09-18 · philosophy-of-science, citation-analysis, argument-from-silence, comparative-history, structural-equivalence
• Does LLM citation-popularity bias measurably compound across successive training generations as LLM-selected citations re-enter training corpora?
  capture promoted 2026-09-14 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• The cross-vendor citation-selection agreement behind citation-popularity bias collapses under recursion when candidates are AI-generated, even as concentration on real papers survives
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-14 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• A twelve-round recursive citation-selection benchmark finds citation concentration on real papers intensifies through dilution of the candidate pool, not through the underlying preference growing stronger
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-14 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• The model cites the famous, not the relevant — LLM citation selection skews toward already-highly-cited work independent of relevance or recency, a mechanical reproduction of Merton's Matthew effect now independently replicated across authors, databases, fields, and model generations
  topic map 2026-09-14 · matthew-effect, citation-metrics, llm, chatgpt, bibliometrics
• Is Petiška's 2023 finding that GPT-4 selects citations by raw Google Scholar popularity replicated elsewhere, and does the vault's citational-narrowing pattern predict how that bias compounds as LLM output becomes training data?
  capture promoted 2026-09-13 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• Algaba et al. 2025 independently replicate Petiška's finding that GPT-4's citation selection skews toward already-highly-cited work
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-13 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• Naser 2026's ten-model citation audit finds the same popularity-driven citation-selection bias across every major LLM vendor
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-09-13 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• Petiška's 2023 citation-popularity finding is now independently replicated by two later studies, across different authors, databases, fields, and models
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-09-13 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• What genuinely connects the Kelly-Luccioni embedding-false-friend note and the Garfield/Seglen-Steck scalar-proxy claim?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-09-04 · embedding-false-friend, jingle-fallacy, bridge-investigation, meta-vault, cosine-similarity
• The cosine-0.87 pairing between the vault's Kelly-Luccioni "embedding false friend" note and its Garfield-Seglen-Steck "scalar-proxy" claim is a confirmed bridge — and a species the vault's taxonomy has not catalogued: convergent grounding, divergent kind
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-09-04 · embedding-false-friend, jingle-fallacy, bridge-investigation, meta-vault, cosine-similarity
• Garfield/Seglen's warning against journal-mean-citation-as-individual-proxy and Steck/Ekanadham/Kallus's warning against cosine-similarity-as-relatedness-proxy share the identical structure: a cheap scalar misapplied as a substitute for a harder judgment
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-31 · garfield, seglen, harald-steck, cosine-similarity, impact-factor
• Does the measurement-theory or statistics literature already name the general pattern behind the Garfield/Seglen and Steck/Ekanadham/Kallus warnings — a scalar aggregate substituted for a property it cannot measure?
  question open 2026-08-31 · measurement, ecological-fallacy, goodharts-law, bibliometrics, cosine-similarity
• Merton's 1968 'Matthew effect' bridges two unlinked vault clusters — Garfield's own warning against citation-count shortcuts, and 2025 RAG research separating reliability from relevance — via a 2023 finding that ChatGPT reproduces the effect mechanically
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-28 · sociology-of-science, robert-merton, matthew-effect, eugene-garfield, bibliometrics
• Robert Merton coined "the Matthew effect" in a 1968 Science paper describing skewed credit allocation among scientists
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-28 · sociology-of-science, robert-merton, matthew-effect, eugene-garfield, bibliometrics
• A 2023 study found ChatGPT selects citations by relying solely on Google Scholar citation counts, framed by its author as the Matthew effect operating inside an LLM
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-28 · chatgpt, llm, citation-metrics, matthew-effect, bibliometrics
• What genuinely connects claim-brooks-1991-does-not-cite-dreyfus and claim-david-brachet-2011-citing-papers-contain-zero-ml-work: both are the vault's argument-from-silence method testing whether a cross-field name-echo hides real lineage — not the same mechanism, but the same higher-order pattern the vault already calls the jingle fallacy
  capture promoted 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, jingle-fallacy, brooks, dreyfus
• The vault's Brooks/Dreyfus and David-Brachet-citing-papers negative-citation findings are both argument-from-silence instances, but only the Brooks/Dreyfus pair is tagged and MOC-indexed as such
  observation seedling Tier 1 2026-08-15 · argument-from-silence, negative-citation, brooks, dreyfus, david-brachet
• Verify the absence of citation lineage between ML catastrophic-forgetting research and organizational-forgetting research via a proper bibliometric check
  capture promoted 2026-08-12 · catastrophic-forgetting, organizational-forgetting, citation-analysis, bibliometrics, cross-domain-bridge
• The 60 papers citing David & Brachet (2011), per Semantic Scholar, contain no ML or connectionist work
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-12 · catastrophic-forgetting, organizational-forgetting, citation-analysis, bibliometrics, cross-domain-bridge
• David & Brachet (2011)'s complete reference list contains no citation to the ML catastrophic-forgetting literature
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-12 · catastrophic-forgetting, organizational-forgetting, citation-analysis, bibliometrics, cross-domain-bridge
• Semantic Scholar's Graph API elides publisher-controlled reference lists for McCloskey & Cohen (1989) and French (1999), blocking a direct citation-graph check against organizational-forgetting research
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-12 · catastrophic-forgetting, organizational-forgetting, citation-analysis, bibliometrics, source-verification
• Verify Hargens & Schuman (1990)'s own figures on department-level use of citation data in hiring, tenure, promotion, and salary decisions, and confirm the source of the '5,000 departments by 1998' estimate
  capture promoted 2026-08-10 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, cameron
• Does the sentence 'an inappropriate and misleading measure of individual research, especially if used for tenure and promotion' belong to Brian D. Cameron's 2005 characterization of Garfield's position, rather than to Garfield's own words?
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-08-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, cameron
• Cameron (2005), citing Hargens & Schuman (1990), reports citation data already used for hiring, tenure, promotion, and salary in roughly a third of surveyed US biochemistry departments and most sociology departments
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-08-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, cameron
• Cameron (2005), not Garfield, authored the widely repeated 'inappropriate and misleading measure of individual research... tenure and promotion' sentence
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, cameron
• Verify Hargens & Schuman (1990)'s own figures on department-level use of citation data in hiring, tenure, promotion, and salary decisions, and confirm the source of the '5,000 departments by 1998' estimate
  question open 2026-08-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, research-assessment, verification, quantitative-claims
• Locate Eugene Garfield's primary text for his warnings that the impact factor should not be used to evaluate individuals
  capture promoted 2026-08-07 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, science-policy
• Garfield grounds his warning against individual-level use of the journal impact factor in one recurring mechanism: wide citation variance among articles within the same journal
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-08-07 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, seglen
• Does the sentence 'an inappropriate and misleading measure of individual research, especially if used for tenure and promotion' belong to Brian D. Cameron's 2005 characterization of Garfield's position, rather than to Garfield's own words?
  question answered 2026-08-07 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, source-criticism
• Euler's total lifetime work count has no single agreed figure across sources — reported totals range from 560 to 866
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-08-01 · history-of-mathematics, disability, blindness, euler, quantitative
• Does Clarivate itself attribute the 2022→2023 Saudi-affiliated HCR count drop (109→76) to its tightened evaluation methodology, or is that link only SIRIS Academic's inference?
  capture promoted 2026-07-30 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• No Clarivate-authored source links the 2023 methodology tightening to the Saudi-affiliated HCR count drop — the causal claim is SIRIS Academic's own inference
  claim seedling Tier 2 2026-07-30 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• Independently re-verify the Clarivate Highly-Cited-Researcher Saudi-affiliation counts (27→109→76) and the reported per-scientist payment figures against primary sources
  capture promoted Tier 2 2026-07-29 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• An independent 2014/2015 re-analysis of the original Thomson Reuters HCR list ranked King Abdulaziz University #2 worldwide by total researcher mentions — roughly six times the '27 primary-affiliation' count
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-29 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• Clarivate tightened its Highly Cited Researchers evaluation methodology ahead of the 2023 list, more than doubling excluded candidates
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-29 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• Does Clarivate itself attribute the 2022→2023 Saudi-affiliated HCR count drop (109→76) to its tightened evaluation methodology, or is that link only SIRIS Academic's inference?
  question answered 2026-07-29 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• Ke et al. (PNAS 2015) found delayed scientific recognition is a continuum with no natural cutoff — 'Sleeping Beauties' are a tail, not a distinct class
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-12 · bibliometrics, delayed-vindication, history-of-science, sleeping-beauties, sociology-of-science
• The Hawks-2007 / Jeffress-1948 cosine pairing is an embedding false friend — shared rhetorical surface, not shared phenomenon
  capture promoted 2026-07-11 · embeddings, cosine-similarity, semantic-similarity, epistemics, history-of-science
• Garfield's citation count became a target, and science built an institution to fight it
  capture promoted 2026-07-09 · hop, bibliometrics, citation-metrics, goodharts-law, science-policy
• Clarivate's Highly Cited Researchers list became a market Saudi universities bought into — the exact misuse Garfield warned about
  capture promoted 2026-07-09 · hop, bibliometrics, science-policy, citation-metrics, clarivate
• The h-index inventor became science's fraud-hunting forensic mathematician
  capture promoted 2026-07-09 · hop, bibliometrics, research-integrity, physics, fraud-detection
• The 2013 San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) formally names journal-based metrics as the problem and tells institutions not to use them to judge individual research
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, goodharts-law, science-policy
• Eugene Garfield repeatedly warned that impact-factor metrics are unfit for judging individual researchers — the exact misuse later found in the Saudi affiliation scheme
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, goodharts-law
• Garfield's Institute for Scientific Information passed through Thomson to become the private-equity-owned, publicly traded Clarivate
  claim seedling Tier 4 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, private-equity, research-infrastructure
• Jorge Hirsch, a condensed-matter physicist, invented the h-index in 2005 as a single number for an individual scientist's output
  claim seedling Tier 4 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, h-index, hirsch, research-assessment
• Saudi universities bought their way onto Clarivate's Highly Cited Researchers list by paying foreign scientists for a secondary affiliation
  claim seedling Tier 3 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• Wilhite & Fong (2012) documented coercive self-citation — editors pressuring authors to add citations to the editor's own journal — as a common, measurable practice
  claim seedling Tier 1 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, goodharts-law, coercive-citation
• Independently re-verify the Wilhite & Fong (2012) coercive-citation figures and the DORA (2013) declaration text against their primary sources
  question answered 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, dora, verification, source-criticism
• Locate Eugene Garfield's primary text for his warnings that the impact factor should not be used to evaluate individuals, to replace the Tier-4 Wikipedia citation
  question answered 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, impact-factor, garfield, verification
• Independently re-verify the Clarivate Highly-Cited-Researcher Saudi-affiliation counts (27→109→76) and the reported per-scientist payment figures against primary sources
  question open 2026-07-09 · bibliometrics, citation-metrics, clarivate, highly-cited-researchers, saudi-universities
• Year-by-year citation counts for Linnainmaa 1976 (DOI 10.1007/BF01931367) — Semantic Scholar histogram, cross-checked against Google Scholar
  capture promoted Tier 1 2026-07-07 · linnainmaa, backpropagation, automatic-differentiation, citation-history, citation-analysis
• Linnainmaa 1976's citation record, finally pulled — 51 dated citations across 1978–2009, then 245 in the sixteen years since 2010
  claim budding Tier 1 2026-07-07 · linnainmaa, citation-history, bibliometrics, backpropagation, myth-ledger
• Myth ledger: 'Linnainmaa's thesis was basically never cited before the 2010s'
  note budding 2026-07-06 · myth, linnainmaa, citation-history, history-of-ml, bibliometrics