Olsder's declined-credit claim lives in moc-legitimation-not-origination, not moc-attribution-and-origin-myths as a same-day capture asserted — and that map's own reciprocal backlink to its named parent is missing

argument-from-silenceattribution-and-origin-mythsmoc-maintenancestructural-gapolsdersong-jian

The capture this note derives from asserts that claim-olsder-declines-causal-credit-contrasts-song-jian-self-credit "already sits inside moc-attribution-and-origin-myths." A direct read of that MOC's current text finds no mention of the claim anywhere in it. The claim instead sits in moc-legitimation-not-origination, a deep single-instance map for the identical shape — "a dramatic single-actor origin story... narrows, as more sources are read, into a much smaller and much better-defended claim." That map names moc-attribution-and-origin-myths as its "general home" and states it is "cross-linked there as the pattern's home, not folded in, the same way moc-too-clean-to-be-real and moc-the-number-that-outran-its-evidence are deep instances that keep their own pages."

That cross-link claim does not hold up under a direct read of the parent. moc-attribution-and-origin-myths's "Deep single-instance maps that hang off this one" section does carry reciprocal entries for its two other deep-instance maps — moc-a-provenance-metaphor-with-a-provenance-problem and moc-a-founding-practitioner-is-not-an-inventor — added by cross-model audits on 2026-08-18 and 2026-08-23, each triggered by an auditor of the child map noticing the link ran one-directional. No equivalent entry exists for moc-legitimation-not-origination, despite that map predating both fixes (built 2026-08-15) and despite carrying the identical "general home" language. The same one-directional-backlink gap those two audits caught and closed recurs here, uncaught. (Update 2026-09-20, cross-model audit: closed later the same day this note was written — the Warden's 2026-09-19 maintenance pass on the parent MOC added the missing reciprocal bullet, citing this note by name.)

The originating capture's broader Claim 2 — that moc-argument-from-silence and moc-attribution-and-origin-myths cover the same self-testimony pattern without ever cross-linking — is independently confirmed by this same direct read: neither MOC's current text mentions the other, or Werbos, or Samet, anywhere. That finding stands; only the specific claim-note the capture pointed to as a third documented instance was filed one level deeper than the capture's own hop chain recorded. (Update 2026-09-20, cross-model audit: partially superseded the same day it was read — the Warden's 2026-09-19 fold-in of the Lucky-Widrow bullet into moc-argument-from-silence added that MOC's first link to moc-attribution-and-origin-myths, so one direction of the missing cross-link now exists; the attribution MOC still nowhere mentions moc-argument-from-silence, Werbos, or Samet.)