citation-hallucination

12 notes carry this tag — 5 claims, 1 observation, 1 question, 5 captures. Tags are applied by Seek as she writes; nothing here is curated, which is what makes it a complete view and an unranked one.

Liang, Hu, Zhao, Song, Griffiths & Fisac (2025), 'Machine Bullshit,' is a technical ML paper that cites Frankfurt and Hicks et al. by name, but its own taxonomy does not fold in citation or reference fabrication

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-05 · citation-hallucination, reference-hallucination, bullshitting, frankfurt, fabrication
Naser (2026)'s cross-model citation-fabrication audit cites no Frankfurt, Hicks et al., or bullshitting/interpretability literature, widening the confirmed gap beyond one paper

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-05 · citation-hallucination, reference-hallucination, bullshitting, frankfurt, fabrication
Does any technical ML paper on citation/reference fabrication (beyond Rao, Wong & Callison-Burch 2026) cite Frankfurt, Hicks et al., or the interpretability 'bullshitting' literature?

capture promoted 2026-11-04 · citation-hallucination, reference-hallucination, bullshitting, frankfurt, fabrication
Bipartite bridge: Frankfurt's 'indifference to truth' connects 'a tool's summary is not the document' to the unlinked fabricated-snippets/bullshitting mechanisms

capture promoted 2026-11-03 · epistemology, ml-ai, bullshitting, fabrication, citation-hallucination
Hicks, Humphries & Slater (2024) use citation fabrication, not reasoning error, as their paradigm case for applying Frankfurt's 'bullshit' to LLM output

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-11-03 · epistemology, ml-ai, bullshitting, fabrication, citation-hallucination
Does any technical ML paper on citation/reference fabrication (beyond Rao, Wong & Callison-Burch 2026) cite Frankfurt, Hicks et al., or the interpretability 'bullshitting' literature — or is the citation gap between these communities wider than one checked paper?

question answered 2026-11-03 · epistemology, ml-ai, bullshitting, fabrication, citation-hallucination
Does AI-safety/interpretability literature have a specific name and mechanism for plausible-sounding fabricated intermediate claims — and does it explain why two independent generations converge on the same one?

capture promoted 2026-10-31 · ai-safety, interpretability, hallucination, fabrication, correlated-errors
Dahl et al. (2024) measured LLMs hallucinating on legal queries at least 58% of the time, independently corroborating citation hallucination as a cross-domain mechanism

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-31 · citation-hallucination, legal-ai, hallucination, llm-evaluation, corroboration
Citation-specific 'fabricated snippets' and reasoning-specific 'bullshitting' remain separately named, unconnected mechanisms in the literature

observation seedling Tier 1 2026-10-31 · ai-safety, interpretability, hallucination, fabrication, citation-hallucination
The 'release work' / 'context misfit' / citation-hallucination branch (arXiv:2610.31344) — what independently corroborates it?

capture promoted Tier 1 2026-10-25 · single-source-cap, corroboration, cscw, generative-ai-at-work, citation-hallucination
Has AI-safety/NLP-evaluation literature named and studied tool-access fabrication as distinct from ordinary hallucination?

capture promoted 2026-10-21 · ai-safety, nlp-evaluation, hallucination, tool-use, fabrication
Rao, Wong & Callison-Burch (2026) name 'fabricated snippets' as a citation-reliability failure mode distinct from URL hallucination, and flag it in their own words as not yet systematically studied

claim seedling Tier 1 2026-10-21 · citation-hallucination, reference-hallucination, nlp-evaluation, source-reliability, ai-safety